The Mayor of Budapest says we are at war with Russia. In any case, according to this statement, the Lord Mayor has no intention whatsoever of going to war against the Russians – against Putin, each to his own liking. Some news portals watch with a wary eye and hardly fail to report when a few hundred demonstrators are hanging around Budapest, but when the Lord Mayor, whose every word is grave, announces that we are at war with Russia, he pretends to be deaf and blind. What the Lord Mayor is doing would be dangerous if he and everything he says could not be handled properly. Fortunately, they can handle him and what he says in the right way. As we know, he will not go to the front to lead by example anyway, because his kind of politician has always watched the bloody and deadly historical events from the velvet chairs of well-cooled and heated ivory towers.
But it’s not the biggest hit of the moment. The biggest hit is Szilard Suhajda and risk-taking as a topic for discussion. Is it necessary and how necessary, if necessary? Is the safe life the way to go, or is it pushing the limits? Szilard Suhajda this, Szilard Suhajda that… But still, who cares if this man in his forties made a bad decision? With this case, the media is diverting attention from something orbitally disgusting. The media, which is already pondering the real chances of a third world war breaking out, is using the method of the level of words to perfection. The words that reach the masses sooner or later become a solidified reality. The word becomes flesh. Honestly, how much longer do you have to feel sorry for a man who had a multi-million dollar hobby and chose it over his family? His heart’s right, he knew full well the dangers of such a fad. So he assessed the dangers, and he pursued his favourite hobby in the knowledge of the dangers. But within twenty-four hours, two Hungarian footballers had died, five car accidents had happened in which the drivers were all made ill, and a seventh-grade boy had his heart stopped in PE class.
These cases are not all over the mainstream media, but Szilard Suhajda is shoved in people’s faces twice an hour. They brainwash people. And what kind of circus are they diverting attention from? What is all this circus about anyway, as if nothing has happened in the last two or three years? What justification can there be for all this collection racket to keep people on the run? In an earlier article I reported that they want to create a unipolar world government for two thousand and thirty throughout the world. With this in mind, the question must simply arise in everyone’s mind: why pay more interest to the banks, why pay sanctions, electricity bills, gas bills and so on to institutions and banks that call themselves the state, when the very communication itself is quite open about the intention that the Klaus Schwab-led company wants to ultimately communicate everything in the world. This is being declared and they are increasingly trying to get the masses to accept the idea that this is fated to happen.
The absolutely logical question arises: if I am warned in advance that all my property will be communalised for environmental and other spurious reasons, why should I continue to finance the enrichment of the few who have been taking a share of the people’s money for thousands of years on the pretext of public service? In that case, why not immediately suspend this habitual practice? If everything is common anyway, and communication is becoming a part of everything, and this is something that has to be taken into account by the happy-go-lucky, proud owner of this or that item of equipment, car, flat and underwear with holes in it, then why not admit it, that the hoarder lifestyle is now a dead duck, and that the elite caste, which already has all the goods on earth, has no right to accept anything from anyone as a form of tax or interest?
Well, not that they have the right, in practice – even if not in theory – to suddenly lay their hands on all existing landed property as the sole judge and owner in order to abolish private property. For a world without property is a beautiful thing, as Rousseau dreamed and imagined it, and all the Christian teachings on the rejection of matter as such and hence of material things and the importance of unconditional love can be wonderfully harmonised with the ideals of communism, but there can be no man on earth who, proclaiming himself the saviour of mankind, can be a vigilante and appeal to the public interest, or to Mother Earth, or to any divine inspiration as an empowering medium. In any case, if anyone, the public has not empowered them at all. The public, who, or which, behind every move, suspects the politician they know, the politician who is shoved in their face in the headlines, and who attaches no importance whatsoever to the Schwab brigade.
