Training is provided by the Government of Hungary. Preparation for a possible war with a serious outcome, so that the country can be defended against it. So they are gradually preparing the people, which is why the first step was a certain billboard with the slogan ‘are you prepared? Today, large-scale wars are no longer fought out of emotion, but in cold blood, with the necessary propaganda machinery, the necessary public mood is created according to the wishes of the client, and with it, finally, the hundred-yearly genocide. Let’s not be childish, the country has an army. The technology is now available to flatten everything and blow it up with the press of a few buttons, and it doesn’t need tens of thousands more. That should be well understood by everyone. The ridiculous order in question must be denied to everyone. If ever I, as a pacifist, take up arms against anyone, it will be some rotten old bankers. They have already bought this country anyway, so please, what is all the fuss and farce about? It will be defended with guns, with their blood and sweat by the settlers – or not settlers – who have bought and claim and claim ownership of the country’s assets and its territories. They will die for the country if they play squatters, and they can hardly stop themselves from boasting about their purchase.
It has also recently emerged that Hungarian women can be invited for training by the mayor. Women will not get away with the war this time either, therefore, as they have now become so emancipated that they can go to the slaughterhouse in the eyes of the war-makers. After all, they have been fighting for equal treatment for decades, and now they have the right to die alongside men. Besides, an insider is mocking the whole story as a three-day war. And why is he doing this? Because, according to him, the first day is about rest, the second day is about medical leave, and the third day is for everyone to run where they see fit. But don’t let anyone think that’s all the story is about, and that’s the end of it. It is all a covert training exercise, or rather the first stage of one. And after the second phase, all those who participated in the first phase will go to the front. So it’s all gradual, and it’s all about getting as many people as possible to bite the dust. No defence is the aim, the aim is for you to die, along with millions of others. So that a few can take your place, so that there is enough room for them. Because you are considered superfluous and a distraction. It’s about nothing else, and you’d do well to realize that in time. Given the current direction, it’s better to be constantly on your guard.
In the early 1970s, the United States and much of the Western world were plunged into a stagflationary economic crisis. Nixon, with the help of the Federal Reserve in 1971 (or perhaps at the direction of the Fed), moved the dollar completely away from the gold standard, which eventually escalated inflationary pressures. Europe’s post-war boom came to an abrupt end, while the price of commodities (and oil/gasoline) in the US skyrocketed until 1981-1982, when the Federal Reserve raised interest rates to around 20%, causing a deliberate recessionary crash. Interestingly, just before the devaluation of the gold standard, the IMF created the SDR system in 1969 (the same SDR that the IMF was ready to use as the basis for a global digital currency mechanism). This period is often portrayed in the movies as an era of disco, drugs, hippies and rock n’ roll fun-for-life, but the reality is that the early 1970s was the beginning of the end for the West – a moment when our economic foundations were deliberately destroyed and the prosperity of the middle class was slowly but surely stolen by inflation. In the midst of this economic ‘malaise’, which Jimmy Carter later called a ‘crisis of confidence’, the UN and its associated globalist round table groups worked hard to develop a system to persuade the population to accept the global centralisation of power. Their aims were quite direct.
What they wanted: a logical basis for government regulation of the human population. Power to constrain industry. Power to control energy production and control energy resources. Power to control or limit food production and agriculture. Power to micro-manage the lives of individuals for an ‘even better’ to be determined later. A socialised society in which the right to individual property is renounced. A single world economic system that they would control. A world currency system. A single world government governing a handful of separate regions. One of the most revealing quotes from the plan comes from Strobe Talbot, the Clinton administration’s deputy secretary of state, who declared in Time magazine that, „In the next century, nations as we know them will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority…
National sovereignty was not such a good idea after all.” To understand how the system works, here’s a quote from Richard Gardner, a globalist member of the Council on Foreign Relations, from a 1974 article in Foreign Affairs Magazine entitled „The Bumpy Road to World Order”: in summary, the „house of world order” must be built from the bottom up, not from the top down. It will seem like a big „rumbling, buzzing mess” to use William James’ famous description of reality, but by dismantling national sovereignty, step by step, much more will be achieved than by the old-fashioned frontal assault. In other words, the globalists knew that gradualism would be the only way to create a unified world power structure that governed NOW, rather than hiding the rule of elitists behind secret organisations and puppet politicians. They want a global empire in which they will be the anointed „philosopher-kings” described in Plato’s Republic. Their narcissistic egos can do nothing but yearn to worship the secretly hated masses. But even in the face of gradualism, they know that public opinion will eventually catch on, and when our freedoms erode, they will try to resist. It’s one thing to create an empire, it’s another to keep it.
National sovereignty was not such a good idea after all.” To understand how the system works, here’s a quote from Richard Gardner, a globalist member of the Council on Foreign Relations, from a 1974 article in Foreign Affairs Magazine entitled „The Bumpy Road to World Order”: in summary, the „house of world order” must be built from the bottom up, not from the top down. It will seem like a big „rumbling, buzzing mess” to use William James’ famous description of reality, but by dismantling national sovereignty, step by step, much more will be achieved than by the old-fashioned frontal assault. In other words, the globalists knew that gradualism would be the only way to create a unified world power structure that governed NOW, rather than hiding the rule of elitists behind secret organisations and puppet politicians. They want a global empire in which they will be the anointed „philosopher-kings” described in Plato’s Republic. Their narcissistic egos can do nothing but yearn to worship the secretly hated masses. But even in the face of gradualism, they know that public opinion will eventually catch on, and when our freedoms erode, they will try to resist. It’s one thing to create an empire, it’s another to keep it.
The globalists have been scheming to use environmental protection as a pretext for centralisation since at least 1972, when the Club of Rome published its study „The Limits to Growth”. Funded as a joint project with MIT, the study, limited to industry and resources, seemed to have the results written well in advance – the end of the planet is near unless nations and individuals sacrifice their sovereignty. How convenient for the globalists who funded the study… Twenty years later, a book was published entitled „The First Global Revolution”. In particular, they discuss the use of global warming as a tool for supranational governance: ‘While searching for a common enemy to unite against, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would serve the purpose.
Taken together and interacting, these phenomena represent a common threat that all must face together. But when we call these threats the enemy, we fall into the trap we have already warned readers about, namely, confusing symptoms with causes. All these threats are caused by human interference in natural processes and can only be overcome by changing attitudes and behaviour. The real enemy is therefore humanity itself.” By making the mere existence of humanity the greatest threat, globalists have sought to make the community think in unison that they must live within limits. This means that the community should sacrifice its freedom and submit to control in the belief that the human race is too dangerous to be given freedom. The Australian Public Service Broadcasting Corporation’s next news bulletin was broadcast in 1973, shortly after the founding of the Club of Rome.
So they are planning to establish a unipolar world order, but first they want to fool the peoples one last time with the cause of national defence and nationalism. There is only one solution, and that is what Ukrainian soldiers have been doing lately: disobeying orders and shooting to death their immediate superiors, their officers, who would send them to their deaths. This is the only acceptable form of murder, because instead of shooting the sons and wives and children of foreign peoples, they are killing those who demand war on their orders. In fact, this attitude would be worth something if conscripted soldiers all over the world followed this example.
