Some medical and legal positions: vaccine administration is a medical intervention. Some medical arguments are that a vaccine is a medical intervention. Even a blood draw can cause this. In Hungary, all invasive procedures legally require the patient’s consent. Ideally, this is a legal consent form that the patient reads and signs in person. If the patient lacks capacity, this must be done by the officially appointed carer or the patient’s legal representative. For children under the age of eighteen, this is the legal representative, or any parent or legal guardian. The patient or his/her representative has the right to refuse any medical intervention, except for those considered life-saving, as neither passive nor active euthanasia is allowed in Hungary. The patient is not legally or legally responsible for refusing any medical examination or intervention. The only exception to this rule is a parent who refuses an intervention for a child, which may later cause serious harm to the child’s health. Among childhood and adult vaccines, only those that have been shown to provide immune protection for several years or even for life against diseases that in the vast majority of cases result in death or serious damage to health, such as TB, Tetanus and Hepatitis B, have been made compulsory.
The development and testing of a vaccine can be a multi-year, even decades-long process. If the epidemic started in December 2019, then an official scientific explanation is needed to answer an important question: how did the vaccine appear in the autumn of 2020, and in hundreds of millions of people? If we look at the statistics of the silica world, we find that neither silica nor the vaccine developed against it meet the criteria described earlier. The virus itself has not killed more people than a severe flu, we do not yet know the immune response time for the vaccine, as the epidemic itself is only six months old and the virus is still being studied. This is the official position. So vaccination cannot be made mandatory from a legal, medical or microbiological point of view. The fact that there is not even a call for a working group of unbiased lawyers, infectologists, microbiologists and doctors to be set up suggests that they have no intention of helping humanity in the fight against the ‘epidemic’, even though such a group could come up with something much more serious than what has been seen so far, including a petition and a public information campaign.
I would be seriously interested to know how they kill a non-living thing, which they don’t even know is not an external intruder, but a nanoparticle controlling the second, restiratory stage of our own organism’s intelligent biological special program, human rns, i.e. a command line reprogramming the dns, which does not cause disease, but cures it with symptoms, and in addition, following an evolutionary survival instinct, controlling cellular function organized on an ontogenetic basis. This is, of course, as high as a cow’s electric hook to the deluded, and some vague conspiracy-minded flat-earth nonsense about a fascist world government springs to mind.