Bell and others

In 1997, Swiss researcher Nicholas Gisin truly started the ball
rolling down this peculiar bowling lane by concocting a particularly startling demonstration. His team created entangled photons
or bits of light and sent them flying seven miles apart along optical
fibers. One encountered an interferometer where it could take one
of two paths, always chosen randomly. Gisin found that whichever
option a photon took, its twin would always make the other choice
instantaneously.
The momentous adjective here is instantaneous. The second photon’s reaction was not even delayed by the time light could have
traversed those seven miles (about twenty-six milliseconds) but
instead occurred less than three ten-billionths of a second later, the
limit of the testing apparatus’s accuracy. The behavior is presumed
to be simultaneous.
Although predicted by quantum mechanics, the results continue to astonish even the very physicists doing the experiments.


It substantiates the startling theory that an entangled twin should
instantly echo the action or state of the other, even if separated by
any distance whatsoever, no matter how great.
This is so outrageous that some have sought an escape clause. A
prominent candidate has been the “detector deficiency loophole,” the
argument that experiments to date had not caught sufficient numbers of photon-twins. Too small a percentage had been observed by
the equipment, critics suggested, somehow preferentially revealing
just those twins that behaved in synch. But a newer experiment in
2002 effectively closed that loophole. In a paper published in Nature
by a team of researchers from the National Institute of Standards and
Technology led by Dr. David Wineland, entangled pairs of beryllium
ions and a high-efficiency detector proved that, yes, each really does
simultaneously echo the actions of its twin.
Few believe that some new, unknown force or interaction is
being transmitted with zero travel time from one particle to its twin.
Rather, Wineland told one of the authors, “There is some spooky
action at a distance.” Of course, he knew that this is no explanation
at all.


Most physicists argue that relativity’s insuperable lightspeed
limit is not being violated because nobody can use EPR correlations
to send information because the behavior of the sending particle is
always random. Current research is directed toward practical rather
than philosophical concerns: the aim is to harness this bizarre
behavior to create new ultra-powerful quantum computers that, as
Wineland put it, “carry all the weird baggage that comes with quantum mechanics.”
Through it all, the experiments of the past decade truly seem to
prove that Einstein’s insistence on “locality”—meaning that nothing
can influence anything else at superluminal speeds—is wrong.
Rather, the entities we observe are floating in a field—a field of
mind, biocentrism maintains—that is not limited by the external
space-time Einstein theorized a century ago.
No one should imagine that when biocentrism points to quantum theory as one major area of support, it is just a single aspect of
quantum phenomena. Bell’s Theorem of 1964, shown experimentally to be true over and over in the intervening years, does more
than merely demolish all vestiges of Einstein’s (and others’) hopes
that locality can be maintained.
Before Bell, it was still considered possible (though increasingly iffy) that local realism—an objective independent universe—
could be the truth. Before Bell, many still clung to the millennia-old
assumption that physical states exist before they are measured. Before
Bell, it was still widely believed that particles have definite attributes and values independent of the act of measuring.

And, finally,
thanks to Einstein’s demonstrations that no information can travel
faster than light, it was assumed that if observers are sufficiently far
apart, a measurement by one has no effect on the measurement by
the other.
All of the above are now finished, for keeps.
In addition to the above, three separate major areas of quantum
theory make sense biocentrically but are bewildering otherwise.
We’ll discuss much of this at greater length in a moment, but let’s
begin simply by listing them. The first is the entanglement just cited,
which is a connectedness between two objects so intimate that they
behave as one, instantaneously and forever, even if they are separated by the width of galaxies. Its spookiness becomes clearer in the
classical two-slit experiment.

tmz

Biocentrizmus

Egy nép sajátos háborúja

MI TÖRTÉNIK VALÓJÁBAN ROMÁNIÁBAN?„Takarodj ki az országból WHO!”- skandálják a tüntetők, akik gyülekeznek Bukarestben az elnöki palota előtt, ahol délután covid-gyűlés lesz. Az egykori náci Németország eszközeit megszégyenítő terrorista módszerekkel operál jelenleg a Klaus Iohannis államfő és a bukott román miniszterelnök, Florin Cîțu vezette bukaresti kormány.Mivel egyértelművé vált, hogy a romániai covid-kormány sem manipulációval, sem […]

Read More
Biocentrizmus

Románia kitart, alkotmánybírói döntés Magyarországon

Románia a következő ország a sorban, akit meg szükséges nyúzni büntetésül, amiért állampolgárai nem vették komolyan a vakcinázást. Rengetegen kiállnak a kovid-terror ellen Romániában, beleértve természetesen az értelmiségi réteget is – tanárokat, orvosokat, jogászokat -, akik akaratát a világelit orvosai már le is söpörte egyetlen könnyed mozdulattal az asztalról azzal, amikor egyszerűen kijelentették, hogy segíteni […]

Read More
Biocentrizmus

The situation in Triest

In Italy, the ball is on, at least among the unvaccinated, who we will call healthy for now, as the term unvaccinated is in itself offensive and discriminatory. The protesters are not receiving any support from any left-wing or rights associations, which the police are dispersing with increasingly brutal means. And the left-wing rights organisations, […]

Read More